The Effective Diagnosis of Chronic Monoarthropathy
What are Our Options?
Keywords:
Arthroscopy, infective arthritis, inflammatory arthritis, monoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging, tuberculosisAbstract
Introduction: Monoarticular arthritis which means inflammation, (infective or non-infective) of single synovial joint is a huge burden in the health care system. Chronic monoarthritis is characterized by its progressive onset and slow development, commonly presenting with mild inflammatory signs. The clinical presentation is usually nonspecific especially in the early stages. To evaluate the role of clinical, hematological and immunological features in the diagnosis of peripheral large joint monoarthritis and its correlation with radiographic studies and histopathological studies of the same. Materials: A total of 30 patients of a monoarticular joint disease were studied in which conventional radiography, MR imaging, arthroscopy and synovial biopsy as techniques for its diagnosis were compared. Results: The mean age in the present study was 21.23 years with a preponderance of male patients. MRI was found to have high sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (85.7%) in the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory synovitis. Arthroscopy wasfound to have a sensitivity of 83-85% and specificity of 85-86% in diagnosing both inflammatory and infective synovitis. Conclusion: MRI is recommended as additional techniques in the initial diagnostic evaluation when radiography yields negative results. When assessed together with ahistopathological examination of the synovium and mycobacterial cultures, MRI imaging forms a powerful tool in diagnosing tubercular synovitis early. Arthroscopic joint evaluation should be used wherever feasible for a complete evaluation of the knee joint along arthroscopic guided biopsy. Not only does it increase the diagnostic yield of the biopsy but can also diagnose other associated conditions.
References
1. Handa R. Approach to seronegative arthritis. Sarcoidosis. 2003;4:190-2.
2. Bresnihan B. Are synovial biopsies of diagnostic value? Arthritis ResTher 2003;5:271‑8.
3. Sawlani V, Chandra T, Mishra RN, Aggarwal A, Jain UK, Gujral RB,et al. MRI features of tuberculosis of peripheral joints. Clin Radiol2003;58:755‑62.
4. Inaoui R, Bertin P, Preux PM, Trèves R. Outcome of patients withundifferentiated chronic monoarthritis: Retrospective study of 46 cases. Joint Bone Spine 2004;71:209‑13.
5. Berney S, Goldstein M, Bishko F. Clinical and diagnostic features oftuberculous arthritis. Am J Med 1972;53:36‑42.
6. Allali F, Mahfoud‑Filali S, Hajjaj‑Hassouni N. Lymphocytic jointfluid in tuberculous arthritis. A review of 30 cases. Joint Bone Spine2005;72:319‑21.
7. Lertsrisatit P, Nantiruj K, Totemchokchyakarn K, Janwityanujit S. Extraspinal tuberculous arthritis in HIV era. Clin Rheumatol2007;26:319‑21.
8. Lafond EM. An analysis of adult skeletal tuberculosis. J Bone Joint SurgAm 1958;40‑A:346‑64.
9. Enarson DA, Fujii M, Nakielna EM, Grzybowski S. Bone and jointtuberculosis: A continuing problem. Can Med Assoc J 1979;120:139‑45.
10. Hoffman EB, Allin J, Campbell JA, Leisegang FM. Tuberculosis of theknee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(398):100‑6.
11. Tuli SM. Tuberculosis of the Skeletal System: Bones, Joints, Spine andBursal Sheaths. 3rd ed. Bangalore: Jaypee Brothers; 2004.
12. Solomon L, Warwick D, Nayagam S. Apley’s System of Orthopaedicsand Fractures. 8th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2001.
13. Razdan AN, Bhargava KS, Ram A. Synovial biopsy in osteoarticulartuberculosis. J Indian Med Assoc 1966;46:422‑4.
14. Milgram JE. Diagnostic inaccuracy in tuberculosis of bone, joint andbursa. JAMA 1931;97:232.
15. Pitkeathly DA, Griffiths HE, Catto M. Monarthritis. A study of forty‑fivecases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1964;46:685‑96.
16. Shen HL, Xia Y, Li P, Wang J, Han H. Arthroscopic operations inknee joint with early‑stage tuberculosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2010;130:357‑61.
17. Martini M, Gottesman H, Martini‑Benkeddache Y, Daoud A. Conservative treatment of osteoarticular tuberculosis of the elbow. RevChir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1977;63:539‑44.
18. Kaarela K, Tiitinen S, Luukkainen R. Long‑term prognosis ofmonoarthritis. A follow‑up study. Scand J Rheumatol 1983;12:374‑6.
19. Fletcher MR, Scott JT. Chronic monarticular synovitis. Diagnostic andprognostic features. Ann Rheum Dis 1975;34:171‑6.
20. Zmantar C. Inflammatory rheumatism unclassified. Retrospective studyover ten years 1989. Thesis Clermont-Ferrand.
21. Auquier L, Cohen de Lara A, Siaud JR. Course of 173 cases ofmonoarthritis and monoarthropathies with an inflammatory appearance. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1973;40:125‑9.
22. Nishimura K, Sugiyama D, Kogata Y, Tsuji G, Nakazawa T, Kawano S,et al. Meta‑analysis: Diagnostic accuracy of anti‑cyclic citrullinatedpeptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. AnnIntern Med 2007;146:797‑808.
23. Tuli SM. General principles of osteoarticular tuberculosis. ClinicalOrthopaedics and Related Research 2002;398:11-9.
24. Foley‑Nolan D, Stack JP, Ryan M, Redmond U, Barry C, Ennis J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis – Acomparison with plain film radiographs. Br J Rheumatol 1991;30:101‑6.
25. Boutry N, Morel M, Flipo RM, Demondion X, Cotten A. Earlyrheumatoid arthritis: A review of MRI and sonographic findings. AJRAm J Roentgenol 2007;189:1502‑9.
26. Babyn P, Doria AS. Radiologic investigation of rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007;33:403‑40.
27. Ridley N, Shaikh MI, Remedios D, Mitchell R. Radiology of skeletaltuberculosis. Orthopedics 1998;21:1213‑20.
28. Burrill J, Williams CJ, Bain G, Conder G, Hine AL, Misra RR, et al. Tuberculosis: A radiologic review. Radiographics 2007;27:1255‑73.
29. Martini M, editor. Tuberculosis of the upper‑limb joints. In: Tuberculosisof the Bones and Joints. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg;1988. p. 80‑110.
30. Gylys‑Morin VM, Graham TB, Blebea JS, Dardzinski BJ, Laor T,Johnson ND, et al. Knee in early juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: MRimaging findings. Radiology 2001;220:696‑706.
31. Graham TB. Imaging in juvenile arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol2005;17:574‑8.
32. Hervé‑Somma CM, Sebag GH, Prieur AM, Bonnerot V, Lallemand DP. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis of the knee: MR evaluation withGd‑DOTA. Radiology 1992;182:93‑8.
33. Brower AC. Use of the radiograph to measure the course of rheumatoidarthritis. The gold standard versus fool’s gold. Arthritis Rheum1990;33:316‑24.
34. Hartley RM, Liang MH, Weissman BN, Sosman JL, Katz R,Charlton JR, et al. The value of conventional views and radiographicmagnification in evaluating early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum1984;27:744‑51.
35. Sanghvi DA, Iyer VR, Deshmukh T, Hoskote SS. MRI features oftuberculosis of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 2009;38:267‑73.
36. Af Klint E, Catrina AI, Matt P, Neregråd P, Lampa J, Ulfgren AK, et al. Evaluation of arthroscopy and macroscopic scoring. Arthritis Res Ther2009;11:R81.
37. Kurosaka M, Ohno O, Hirohata K. Arthroscopic evaluation of synovitisin the knee joints. Arthroscopy 1991;7:162‑70.
38. Revell PA, Mayston V. Histopathology of the synovial membraneof peripheral joints in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis1982;41:579‑86.
39. Robles Gil J, Katona G, Barroso MR. Arthroscopy as an aid to diagnosisand investigation. InExcerpta Medica International Congress Series1968;143:16.
40. Marquet D. The histology of the synovial membrane in monoarthropathies. Diagnostic report and anatomo-evolutionary confrontation concerning 131 cases 1981. Thesis Medicine Clermont-Ferrand.
41. Amouroux J, Cywiner-Golenzer C. Contribution of the synovial biopsy inthe diagnosis of mono and oligo-arthritis. Rheumatology News presentedto the Paris practitioner: Expansion Scientifique;1979. p. 140-6.
42. Gibson T, Fagg N, Highton J, Wilton M, Dyson M. The diagnostic valueof synovial biopsy in patients with arthritis of unknown cause. Br JRheumatol 1985;24:232‑41.
43. Villiaumey J, Strauss J, Di Menza C, Larget‑Piet B, Rotterdam M. Lesmonoarthrites rhumatoïdes. Rev Rhum Mal Ostéoart 1973;40:627‑34.
44. Misgar MS, Hussain A. The role of synovial biopsy in tuberculosissynovitis knee. J Indian Med Assoc 1981;77:125‑7.
45. Reisis N, Dendrinos G, Fragiadakis E, Trouli H, Hartofylakides G. Value of tissue biopsy in bone and joint tuberculosis. Acta Orthop Belg1989;55:12‑6.
46. Jain AK, Singh M, Rijal R, Ramachandran VG, Jena SK. Comparisonof culture and nucleic acid amplification methods for diagnosis oftuberculosis of the dorsal spine. Curr Orthop Pract 2010;21:171‑6.
47. Malaviya AN, Kotwal PP. Arthritis associated with tuberculosis. BestPract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003;17:319‑43.
48. Holmdahl HC. Tuberculosis of the knee; a review of 170 cases. ActaOrthop Scand 1950;20:19‑49.
49. Lakhanpal VP, Tuli SM, Singh H, Sen PC. The value of histology, cultureand guinea pig inoculation examination in osteo‑articular tuberculosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1974;45:36‑42.
50. Wilkinson MC. Synovectomy and curettage in the treatment oftuberculosis of joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1953;35‑B:209‑23.
51. Hald J Jr. The value of histological and bacteriological examination intuberculosis of bones and joints. Acta Orthop Scand 1964;35:91‑7.
52. Dobson J. Prognosis in tuberculosis of the hip; an analysis of the resultsof treatment and of the factors which influence the end‑result. J BoneJoint Surg Br 1951;33B: 149‑59.
53. Johnson JS, Freemont AJ. A 10 year retrospective comparison of thediagnostic usefulness of synovial fluid and synovial biopsy examination. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:605‑7.
54. Wallace R, Cohen AS. Tuberculous arthritis: A report of two cases withreview of biopsy and synovial fluid findings. Am J Med 1976;61:277‑82.
55. Jain AK, Jena SK, Singh MP, Dhammi IK, Ramachadran VG, Dev G,et al. Evaluation of clinico‑radiological, bacteriological, serological,molecular and histological diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis. Indian J Orthop 2008;42:173‑7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 V. Anil, Supreeth Nekkanti, Abhimanyu Kukralia, Ramneek Mahajan, Arun Mahtani (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in the Nigerian Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma retain the copyright to their work.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
