Morphometric Analysis of Calcaneal Angles in Igbos of South East of Nigeria and Its Clinical Implication

A plain X-ray study

Authors

  • Amechi Uchenna Katchy University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu Author
  • Ngozi Rosemary Njeze University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu Author
  • David Okoroafor Federal Teaching Hospital Abakiliki Author

Keywords:

Calcaneal angles, clinical implications, Igbos

Abstract

Introduction: The calcaneum is repeatedly subjected to static and dynamic stresses especially in the weight‑bearing positions during walking, working or running and this is reflected in the trabecular pattern within the calcaneus. There are six radiological angles associated with this bone notably the Böhler (tuber joint) angle (BA) and Gissane’s angle (GA), and they vary in different ethnic population. Aim: This is to determine the calcaneal angles among the ethnic Igbos of South Eastern Nigeria, determine the relationships between these angles, determine any correlation with gender and age, compare the values of the BA and GA to that of other populations and discuss the clinical implications of the determined values. Methodology: A 5‑year review of all lateral views of X‑rays of the foot and ankle done at Federal Teaching Hospitals, Abakaliki, Nigeria, from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2016, was done. Drawing and mathematical sets were used to measure the six radiological angles on the lateral views of plain X‑ray films of the ankle and subjected them to descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: There were 120 patients, 65 males and 55 females. The calcaneal angles among the ethnic Igbos of South Eastern Nigeria showed the following: BA: 32.58 ± 4.98, GA: 121.22 ± 6.11, calcaneal compression angle: 30.00 ± 3.01, talocalcaneal angle (TCA): 22.58 ± 5.28, calcaneal pitch angle: 17.35 ± 3.79 and apical angle (AA): 67.24 ± 7.27. There was no relationship between these angles. The TCA and AA showed a correlation with gender and age and other angles did not. There was a statistically significant difference between BA values in this study and that of Ugandan and American populations (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the GA values in this study and that of Turkish, New Zealand and Indian populations. Conclusion: These determined values would be a useful tool in the management of patients of Igbo extraction with of the foot pathology.

Author Biographies

  • Amechi Uchenna Katchy, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu

    Department of Accident and Emergency, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu, Enugu

  • Ngozi Rosemary Njeze, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu

    Department of Accident and Emergency, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu, Enugu

  • David Okoroafor, Federal Teaching Hospital Abakiliki

    Department of Radiology, Federal Teaching Hospital Abakiliki, Abakaliki, Nigeria

References

1. Daftary A, Haims AH, Baumgaertner MR. Fractures of the calcaneus:A review with emphasis on CT. Radiographics 2005;25:1215‑26.

2. Ramachandran R, Shetty S. Assessment of Bohler’s and Gissane’sangles of the calcaneum in a group of South Indian population – Aradiological study. Int J Curr Res Rev 2015;7:17‑20.

3. Schepers T, Patka P. Intra‑articular calcaneal fractures; a review of theliterature. Ned Tijdschr Trauma 2008;16:40‑7.

4. Bakker B, Halm JA, Van Lieshout EM, Schepers T. The fate of Böhler’sangle in conservatively‑treated displaced intra‑articular calcanealfractures. Int Orthop 2012;36:2495‑9.

5. Schepers T, Vogels LM, Schipper IB, Patka P. Percutaneous reductionand fixation of intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Oper Orthop Traumatol2008;20:168‑75.

6. Hak DJ, Gautsch TL. A review of radiographic lines and angles used inorthopedics. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 1995;24:590‑601.

7. Didia BC, Dimkpa JN. The calcaneal angle in Nigerians. Relationship tosex, age, and side of the body. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1999;89:472‑4.

8. Igbigbi PS, Mutesasira AN. Calcaneal angle in Ugandans. Clin Anat2003;16:328‑30.

9. Chen MY, Bohrer SP, Kelley TF. Boehler’s angle: A reappraisal. AnnEmerg Med 1991;20:122‑4.

10. Shoukry FA, Aref YK, Sabry AE. Evaluation of the normal calcanealangles in Egyptian population. Alexandria J Med 2012;48:91‑7.

11. Slattery K. The Igbo People – Origins & History. School of English,Queen’s University of Belfast. Available from: http://www.faculty.ucr. edu. [Last retrieved on 2016 Apr 20].

12. Baikie WB. Narrative of an Exploring Voyage up the rivers of Kworaand Binue Commonly known as Niger and TSADDA in 1885 with aMap and Appendices (PDF). John Mueray, Albemarle Street (publishedwith a sanction of Her Majesty’s Government);1856. Available from:http://www.ia600303 us.archive.org. [Last Retrieved on 2018 Feb10].

13. Forrest T. The Advance of African Capital: The Growth of Nigerian PrivateEnterprise (illustrated ed.): University Press of Virginia, University StationCharlottesville VA 22903 1994:p. 272.

14. Mwakikagile G. African Countries: An Introduction with Maps. Pan‑African Books: Continental Press; 2006. p. 86.

15. Bohler L. Diagnosis, pathology, and treatment of fractures of theoscalcis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1931;13:75‑89.

16. Khoshhal KI, Ibrahim AF, Al‑Nakshabandi NA, Zamzam MM,Al‑Boukai AA, Zamzami MM, et al. Böhler’s and Gissane’s angles ofthe calcaneus in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2004;25:1967‑70.

17. Seyahi A, Uludağ S, Koyuncu LO, Atalar AC, Demirhan M. Thecalcaneal angles in the Turkish population. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc2009;43:406‑11.

18. Rokaya PK, Pokharel RK, Lamichhane AP. Radiographic evaluation ofCalcaneal angles in patients presenting to tertiary care center of Nepal.J Inst Med 2016;38:33‑6.

19. Boyle MJ, Walker CG, Crawford HA. The paediatric Bohler’s angle andcrucial angle of Gissane: A case series. J Orthop Surg Res 2011;6:2.

20. Dahiru AU, Ojo SA, Hamidu AU, Danborno B. Calcaneal pitchand lateral talocalcaneal angle among Nigerians. Int J Morphol2013;31:528‑32.

21. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. A survey ofeight hundred and eighty‑two feet in normal children and adults. J BoneJoint Surg Am 1987;69:426‑8.

22. McLaughlin HL. Treatment of late complications after Os calcisfractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1963;30:111‑5.

23. Khan SM, Saheb SH. Anthropometric study of femur in South India. IntJ Anat Res 2014;2:630‑2.

24. Volpon JB. Footprint analysis during the growth period. J Pediatr Orthop1994;14:83‑5.

25. Viladot A. Surgical treatment of the child’s flatfoot. Clin Orthop RelatRes 1992;283:34‑8.

26. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the mediallongitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:45‑9.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

Katchy, A. U., Njeze, N. R., & Okoroafor, D. (2018). Morphometric Analysis of Calcaneal Angles in Igbos of South East of Nigeria and Its Clinical Implication: A plain X-ray study. Nigerian Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma, 17(2), 64-71. https://njot.org/njot/article/view/11