Orthopaedic Subspecialisation

The Nigerian Experience

Authors

  • Peace Ifeoma Amaraegbulam Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia, Abia State Author

Keywords:

Nigeria, orthopaedic, perception, subspecialisation

Abstract

Purpose: Globally, Orthopaedic Surgery is not left out in the trend towards subspecialization in the surgical specialties. This study aims to determine the current perception and practice of subspecialization in Orthopaedics by the Nigerian Orthopaedic surgeon and to make recommendations on the way forward. Methods: A questionnaire was designed and distributed among Orthopaedic surgeons of different cadres. One hundred and twenty (120) questionnaires were sent out and 107 of those were recovered. Their responses were collated and the resulting data was analyzed using the IBM SPSS version 21. Results: One hundred and three (103, 96.3%) of the respondents were males and 4 (3.7%) were females. Eighty-eight (88, 82.2%) were consultants; 98 or 91.6% worked in government facilities. Thirty-eight (38, 35.5%) said they were subspecialists. Ten (10) had subspecialty training 6 months or longer. Nine (9) had more than 75% of their practice in their subspecialty. Twelve (12) subspecialists were satisfied with their level of knowledge while eleven (11) were satisfied with their output. Most of the respondents (103, 96.3%) desired that the subspecialty training should be made mandatory while 102 (95.3%) wanted it incorporated into the regular Orthopaedic training in Nigeria. Conclusions: There is need to standardize the definition and training of Orthopaedic subspecialists in Nigeria, in order to improve the quality of practice and enhance the output and satisfaction among subspecialist surgeons. Postgraduate training in Orthopaedic subspecialties is advocated.

Author Biography

  • Peace Ifeoma Amaraegbulam, Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia, Abia State

    Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria

References

1. Rockwood CA Jr. Keep the family together. J Bone Joint Surg Am1984;66:800‑5.

2. Sarmiento A. On the education of the orthopedic resident. Indian JOrthop 2008;42:241‑4.

3. Almansoori KA, Clark M. Increasing trends in orthopaedicfellowships are not due to inadequate residency training. Educ Res Int2015;2015:9.

4. Muzumdar DP. Advanced subspecialization in medical subspecialtypractice in India: Are we ready for it? J Postgrad Med 2008;54:248‑9.

5. Singh JC. Are we ready for subspecialization and group practice inIndia? Indian J Urol 2006;22:23‑6.

6. Starr A. Subspecialization in orthopaedics: Is there really too much? JBone Joint Surg Am 2003;85‑A: 1849‑50.

7. Sarmiento A. Staying the course. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:479‑83.

8. Daniels AH, DiGiovanni CW. Is subspecialty fellowship trainingemerging as a necessary component of contemporary orthopaedicsurgery education? J Grad Med Educ 2014;6:218‑21.

9. Sarmiento A. Subspecialization in orthopaedics. Has it been all for thebetter? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85‑A: 369‑73.

10. Available from: http://www.aaos.org. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 20].

11. Muteti EN. Subspecialization in the field of orthopaedics. East AfrOrthoap J 2015;9:27‑30.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Amaraegbulam, P. I. (2018). Orthopaedic Subspecialisation: The Nigerian Experience. Nigerian Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma, 17(1), 8-11. https://njot.org/njot/article/view/2