Management of the Wound in Type IIIB Open Tibiofibular Fractures

The Role of Improvised Vacuum‑assisted Closure Dressing

Authors

  • O. M. Babalola Federal Medical Centre Author
  • Oni Nasiru Salawu Federal Medical Centre Author
  • B. A. Ahmed Federal Medical Centre Author
  • G. H. Ibraheem Federal Medical Centre Author
  • J. O. Mejabi Federal Medical Centre Author

Keywords:

Dressing, vacuum, wound

Abstract

Background: The negative pressure used in vacuum‑assisted closure (VAC) dressing helps to suck out fluid and bacteria from the wound and enhances granulation tissue formation and wound contraction, thus causing wound healing. Aim: The aim of the study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of VAC in extensive wound management when using local materials. Methods: This was a prospective study in which all consented patients who met the inclusion criteria within the study period were included in the study; suctioning machine, rubber tube, foam and cling film were adapted to make the local VAC which was used to manage the wound. The results were analysed by IBM SPSS Version 22. Results: Thirty‑two wounds were managed with VAC, there were 28 males and four females, the mean age of patients was 33.7 ± 9.6 years, the mean length of wound managed was 10.6 ± 2.9 cm and the average number of dressing was five times. All wounds were culture positive at the beginning of the management, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common organism. At the end of VAC treatment, 90.6% of the wound were negative for culture. Healing by secondary wound intension occurred in 50% of the wound, secondary suturing was done in 31.2% of the wound, while 18.8% of the wound had split‑thickness skin grafting. The complications noted during the treatment are pain in 9.3% of the patients and skin excoriation in 3.1% of the patients. Conclusion: VAC method of wound management using local materials is effective in the treatment of extensive wound, and it is associated with less frequent dressing to achieve the desired result.

Author Biographies

  • O. M. Babalola, Federal Medical Centre

    Federal Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State, Nigeria

  • Oni Nasiru Salawu, Federal Medical Centre

    Federal Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State

  • B. A. Ahmed, Federal Medical Centre

    Federal Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State

  • G. H. Ibraheem, Federal Medical Centre

    Federal Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State, Nigeria

  • J. O. Mejabi, Federal Medical Centre

    Federal Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State

References

1. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of onethousand and twenty‑five open fractures of long bones: Retrospectiveand prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:453‑8.

2. Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN. Problems in the managementof type III (severe) open fractures: A new classification of type III openfractures. J Trauma 1984;24:742‑6.

3. Davis KM, Griffin KS, Chu TG, Wenke JC, Corona BT, McKinley TO,et al. Muscle‑bone interactions during fracture healing. J MusculoskeletNeuronal Interact 2015;15:1‑9.

4. Laroche M. Intraosseous circulation from physiology to disease. JointBone Spine 2002;69:262‑9.

5. Okike K, Bhattacharyya T. Trends in the management of open fractures. A critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2739‑48.

6. Hertel R, Lambert SM, Müller S, Ballmer FT, Ganz R. On the timingof soft‑tissue reconstruction for open fractures of the lower leg. ArchOrthop Trauma Surg 1999;119:7‑12.

7. Gupta S, Shaikh TP, Wani JB, Gujar A, Bagul A, Gautam R, et al. Roleof vacuum assisted closure therapy in chronic wound: For some cases inNavi Mumbai. Int J Res Med Sci 2016;4:95‑9.

8. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton‑Brown EI, McGuirt W. Vacuum‑assisted closure: A new method for wound control andtreatment: Animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg1997;38:553‑62.

9. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum‑assisted closure: A new methodfor wound control and treatment: Clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg1997;38:563‑76.

10. Raj M, Gill SP, Sheopaltan SK, Singh P, Dinesh, Sigh J, et al. Evaluationof vacuum assisted closure therapy for soft tissue injury in openmusculoskeletal trauma. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:RC05‑8.

11. Venu MH, Balu CB. Prospective study on vacuum assisted closuretherapy in treatment of soft tissue injuries associated with GustiloAnderson compound grade IIIB fractures. Intern J Orthop Sci2016;2:101‑4.

12. Jiburum B, Opara K, Nwagbara I. Experience with vacuum‑assistedclosure device in the management of benign chronic leg ulcers. J WestAfr Coll Surg 2011;1:89‑100.

13. Jones SM, Banwell PE, Shakespeare PG. Advances in woundhealing: Topical negative pressure therapy. Postgrad Med J2005;81:353‑7.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Babalola, O. M., Salawu, O. N., Ahmed, B. A., Ibraheem, G. H., & Mejabi, J. O. (2019). Management of the Wound in Type IIIB Open Tibiofibular Fractures: The Role of Improvised Vacuum‑assisted Closure Dressing. Nigerian Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma, 18(2), 65-68. https://njot.org/njot/article/view/30