Indications and Challenges of Limb Amputation in Children; Experience in a Tertiary Hospital in Enugu Nigeria
Keywords:
Challenges, children, limb amputationAbstract
Background: Limb amputations in children are generally an uncommon procedure and are usually associated with significant emotional implications for the patients and their caregivers. Apart from emotional issues, this surgical procedure, which is often life‑saving is fraught with challenges in a developing country. The aim of the study was to review indications and challenges posed by presentation and consent time in managing children who need amputation. It is hoped that highlighting the challenges will be helpful in improving care for children who may be involved. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study of all children 16 years and below who had limb amputation in Enugu State University of Technology Teaching hospital between January 2015 and December 2019. Results: They were 22 amputations involving 13 (59.0%) males and 9 (41.0%) females, giving a ratio of 1.4:1. Amputations of the lower limb occurred in 15 (68.2%) cases, while the upper limb was involved in 7 (31.8%) cases. Road traffic accident (RTA) 6 (27.3%) and sequalae of Traditional bone setter’s (TBS) intervention 6 (27.3%) after trauma were the most common indications for amputation. Delayed wound healing was the most common complication seen. No mortality was recorded, and consent for surgery was the most common challenge encountered. None of the patients was able to acquire prosthesis due to financial constraints. Conclusion: RTA and bone setter’s intervention in trauma management leading to gangrene are the most common indications for amputation in children. Comprehensive Child health care plan addressing observed challenges could bring a better outcome in children who may need amputation.
References
1. Udosen AM, Ngim N, Etokidem A, Ikpeme A, Urom S, Marwa A. Attitude and perception of patients towards amputation as a formof surgical treatment in the University of Calabar teaching hospital,Nigeria. Afr Health Sci 2009;9:254‑7.
2. Ajibade A, Akinniyi OT, Okoye CS. Indications and complications ofmajor limb amputations in Kano, Nigeria. Ghana Med J 2013;47:185‑8.
3. Omoke NI, Chukwu CO, Madubueze CC, Egwu AN. Traumaticextremity amputations in a Nigerian setting; patterns and challenges ofcare. Int Orthop 2010;36:613‑8.
4. Nwosu C, Babalola MO, Ibrahim MH, Suleiman SI. Major limbamputations in a tertiary hospital in North Western Nigeria. Afr HealthSci 2017;17:508‑12.
5. Dada AA, Awoyomi BO. Is the trend of amputations in Nigeriachanging? A review of 51 consecutive cases seen at Federal MedicalCentre Ebutte Metta, Nigeria. Niger J Med 2010;15:167‑9.
6. Chalya PL, Mbabula PJ, Dass RM, Ngayomela IH, Chandika AB,Mbelenge N, et al. Major limb amputations, atertiary hospital experiencein North Western Tanzania. J Orthop Surg Res 2012;7:18‑22.
7. Akinyoola AL, Oginni LM, Adegbehingbe OO, Orimolade EA,Ogundele OJ. Causes of limb amputations in Nigerian children. WestAfr J Med 2006;25:273‑5.
8. Yakubu A, Mohammed I, Mabogunje O. Limb amputations in childrenin Zaria, Nigeria. Ann Trop Paediatrics 1995;15:163‑5.
9. Garay M, Hennrikus WL, Hess J, Lehman EB, Armstrong DG. Lawnmowers versus children: The devastation continues. Clin OrthopRelat Res 2017;475:950‑6.
10. Okenwa WO, Edeh AJ. Ethical dilemma in paediatric orthopaedicpractice in a resource poor country: Preliminary case series of parentaldecision to withdraw orthodox treatment. Int J Med Sci 2019;4:153‑9.
11. Letton RW, Chwals WJ. Patterns of power mower injuries in childrencompared with adults and the elderly. J Trauma 1994;37:182‑6.
12. Farley FA, Senunas L, Greenfield ML, Warschausky S, Loder RT,Kewman DG, et al. Lower extremity lawn‑mower injuries in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;16:669‑72.
13. Tekpa BJ, Ngongano OG, Keita K, Alumeti D, Sane AD, Dieme CB,et al. Traditionl bone setters’ gangrene of the limb in children in regionalof Kaolack, Senegal. Bull Soc Pathol Extol 2013;106:100‑3.
14. Trautwein LC, Smith DG, Rivara FP. Paediatric amputation injuries:Etiology, cost and outcome. J Trauma 1996;37:182‑6.
15. Paudel B, Shrestha BK, Banskota AK. Two faces of major lower limbamputations. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2005;3:212‑6.
16. Umaru RH, Gali BM, Ali N. Role of inappropriate splintage in limbamputation in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2004;3:138‑40.
17. Onuminya JE, Obekpa PO, Ihezue HC, Ukegbu ND, Onabowale BO. Major limb amputations in Nigeria: A plea to educate traditional bonesetters. Trop Kathmandu Doct 2000;30:133‑5.
18. Seid MY, Birhanu A, Bahiru B, Biruk LW. Causes of paediatric limbamputations at Tikur Anbessa Specialist Hospital and role of traditionalbone setters (WOGESHAS). Ethiop med J 2018;56:161-5.
19. Roche AJ, Selvarajah K. Traumatic amputations in children andadolescents. Demographics from a regional limb fitting Centre in theUnited Kingdom. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011;93:50‑9.
20. Physiopedia Contributors. Principles of Amputations; Physiopedia. Available from: https://www.physiopedia,com/index.php?title=principles_of_Amputation&oldid=229256. [Last accessed on 2020Feb 22].
21. Oborien M, Ismail S, Agbo PS. Paediatrics amputations in Sokoto,North West Nigeria. Sahel Med J 2011;14:30‑2.
22. Mathieu L, Bertani A, Chaudier P, Charpail C, Rongieras F, Chaurin F. Management of the complications of traditional bone setting for upperextremity fractures: The experience of French forward surgical team inChad. Chir Main 2014;33:137‑43.
23. Kejlaa GH. The social and economic outcome after upper limbamputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992;16:25‑31.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Wilfred Okwudili Okenwa (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in the Nigerian Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma retain the copyright to their work.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
